Are living belugas as contaminated as dead belugas?
Everything we know so far about the contamination and health of St.Laurent belugas was obtained from the
examination of stranded animals. One might
ask whether these carcasses are representative of the population as a
whole. Are the bodies of dead belugas more contaminated than those of
belugas still swimming in the river?
To go through the looking glass:
Since 1994, a biopsy program has been underway. Blubber samples
obtained from a representative number of living, photo-identified
individuals will enable scientists to study the level of contaminants in
live belugas and compare it to that of stranded animals.
In short : 
The first results show that, indeed, living belugas are also heavily
contaminated. However, there are differences between dead and live
animals, particularly in which chemicals are more abundant. The levels of
these chemicals in live animals appear to be highly variable. These
differences may originate from distinct metabolic processes in the target
tissues (superficial as opposed to deep blubber). A biopsy allows us to
obtain a sample from the superficial layer of blubber. It is therefore
difficult to interpret biopsy results. To be continuedˇ
Project collaborators:
Pierre Béland, SLNIE,
Robert Michaud, GREMM and SLNIE, Derek Muir, National Water Research
Institute and Ross Norstrom, Environment Canada
Partners:
Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Environment
Canada, World Wildlife Fund Canada, Parks Canada, Ministère de
l'Environnement et de la Faune du Québec, Fondation de la Faune du
Québec and Croisières AML Cruises.

Other research
projects
|