13 December 2001
North Atlantic right whales: mothers die too young
According to a recent study published in the scientific magazine,
Nature, one of the most endangered species of whales in the world has
reached such a low reproductive rate that, if it does not improve, the
North Atlantic right whale will become extinct over the course of the next
two centuries. The drastic drop is due to a major reduction in the life
expectancy of females from 52 years in 1980 to about 15 years in 1995.
Normally, these whales reproduce about six times in their lives. They now
do so only once or twice before dying.
The North Atlantic right whale population numbers around 300. According
to biologists at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), this
species, which is concentrated between the northern coast of Florida and
the Bay of Fundy, would have a slight chance at survival if we succeeded
in reducing the number of deaths by as little as a few per year. For this
reason, conservation efforts in the United States and Canada are aimed at
reducing the number of deaths due to boat collisions and accidental
entanglement in fishing gear. [Environment News Service]
I want to know more:
On Environment News Service:
North Atlantic Right Whale Mothers Dying Out
Or: World's Most Endangered Whales Shielded From Ships
On Whales online:
6 December 2001
A new feeding ground for the North Pacific right whale
Scientists have discovered a group of 5 to 7 North Pacific right
whales. This group occupies a different habitat than that traditionally
used by this species. It spends the summer in the southeastern Bering Sea
feeding in shallow water (50 to 80 m deep) on a species of zooplankton
that, historically, did not make up part of its diet.
The North Pacific right whales is the most endangered large whale in
the world. There are probably only tens of animals left in the
northeastern population. The last sighting of a calf of this species dates
back to more than ten years. The decline of the species is due to
excessive hunting, which ended in the 1960s.
This new feeding ground is the only place where North Pacific right
whales can be found regularly in the summer. At least five right whales
were seen at one time. This constitutes the biggest group sighted since
the middle of the twentieth century. However, the survival of these whales
is uncertain as their ecosystem is subjected to wide variations related to
climate. We do not know where these whales go in winter, or whether this
population contains males and females capable of reproduction. [Associated
Press, Tynan et al.]
I want to know more
Tynan, C. T. et al. 2001. Endangered Right Whales on the Southeastern
Bering Sea Shelf. Science. 294:1894.
Fact sheet
of a related species, endangered as well: the North Atlantic
right whale
Top of page
22 November 2001
Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals
Scientists from the four corners of the planet will be gathering in
Vancouver from November 28 to December 3 for the 14th Biennial
Conference on the Biology of Marine Mammals. On the programme: the most
recent developments in research on marine mammals (seals, sea-lions,
whales, dolphins, manatees, sea otter and polar bear), dealing with their
biology, ecology, management and conservation. New technology for the
study of marine mammals will also be presented. University professors,
students, government researchers and private researchers will be giving
over 320 conferences, hundreds of poster presentations and 5 symposiums.
There will also be 8 workshops organized by conference participants. The
general public will be able to attend special presentations starting
November 29 at 7:30 p.m. at the Vancouver Conference and Exhibition Centre
(http://www.vanconex.com/). This Conference is sponsored by the Society
for Marine Mammology, with the support of Environment Canada and the
Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and is hosted by the Vancouver
Aquarium Marine Science Centre. [Society for Marine Mammalogy]
I want to know more
Site of the
14th Biennial Conference on the Biology of Marine
Mammals
Top of page
8 November 2001
Whaling: the Japanese en route for the Antarctic Ocean
A fleet of five Japanese whalers left the port of Shimonoseki in the
south of Japan on November 6, heading for Antarctic waters. It was the
opening of their annual scientific hunting programme that will last six
months. The goal is to harvest 400 minke whales. This programme, which
respects conditions laid out by the International Whaling Commission, has
raised a general outcry from anti-whaling countries like New Zealand,
Australia and the United States as well as environmental groups like
Greenpeace. The second part of the Japanese scientific whaling programme,
which will take place in May and June in the Pacific Northwest, aims at
harvesting 100 minke whales, 50 Bryde's whales and 8 sperm whales.
[Associated Press]
I want to know more
What is
going on with the whale hunt
Whales online archives:
Whaling:
fifty-third IWC Conference, still no accord
(2 August 2001)
Top of page
25 October 2001
New measures to protect right whales
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the American department
in charge of the management and protection of marine resources, is seeking
public comment on proposed changes to its plan to reduce accidental
entanglement of right whales in fishing gear along the East Coast of the
United States. These new measures will also help the three other species
included in the plan: the humpback whale, the fin whale and the minke
whale.
The first proposed change would amend the types of gear allowed and
apply restrictions on how they are used. The second proposed change is
based on recent analyses of right whale sightings. These analyses enabled
researchers to determine criteria for the establishment of geographical
and temporal right whale feeding zones. These zones, that change as the
animals move, will have their own specific protection measures. Once
established, protection measures in these zones will be valid for 15-day
periods.
The North Atlantic right whale is threatened with extinction. One third
of all deaths are caused by accidental entanglement in fishing gear and
boat collisions. [NMFS]
I want to know more
On Whales online: Right whale
fact sheet
NMFS site:
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan
Top of page
11 October 2001
Japan: open season on small cetaceans
The dolphin hunting season opens during the months of October and
November along Japans coast. Hunters harvest around 20 000 animals
per year, most of them are Dalls porpoises. The main purpose of
this hunt is to produce meat for human consumption. The demand for dolphin
meat rose following the international moratorium on commercial whaling
imposed by the IWC (International Whaling Commission) in 1986.
This hunt is not sustainable for several populations of small
cetaceans. The Dalls porpoise, for example, is now showing signs of
overexploitation. The striped dolphin was also overexploited along
Japans coast between 1940 and 1980. Over the years as many as 22 000
dolphins were killed annually. The present annual quota is 725 striped
dolphins. The striped dolphin quota is never attained despite heavy demand
for its meat. This is indicative of a steep population decline.
During its most recent annual meeting, last July, the IWC passed a
resolution urgently calling on Japan to stop hunting dolphins in its
coastal waters. Japan formulated an objection to this resolution, but
agreed to supply IWCs scientific committee with data in order to
render its activities more transparent.
The hunting of small cetaceans also raises concerns for human health.
The meat is very contaminated by pollutants like PCBs, DDT and mercury. In
fact, a toxicological study has revealed that 52% of cetacean meat
available on the Japanese market is unfit for human consumption due to
high contaminant levels.
The hunting methods used are also under fire because they often imply a
slow, painful death for the animals.
The IWCs authority over the management of small cetaceans is
contested by several of its members. There is no international
organization responsible for the supervision of small cetacean
conservation and management issues, be they hunting, by-catch or habitat
degradation. [Perrin, W. L., Selected examples of small cetaceans at risk,
in Conservation and Management of Marine Mammals, edited by Twiss and
Reeves; Associated Press; IKAN; WDCS; EIA]
I want to know more
On Whales online: The whale
hunt
On the Whales and Dolphins Conservation Society (WDCS) site: Small cetacean hunt; Dall's porpoise
Top of page
27 September 2001
Churchill may have succumbed to his wounds
Churchill, the right whale that made headlines this summer, may be
dead. At 2:18 p.m. on September 16, researchers from the Center for
Coastal Studies lost the tracking signal that had allowed them to follow
the entangled animal for over three months. The loss of the signal could
be due to technical difficulties. It is also possible that the tag is
submerged, which suggests that Churchill may have died and that his
carcass has sunk. This is quite likely given the animals poor
condition the last time he was spotted during the Labour Day weekend. It
was emaciated and its skin, covered with parasites in places, had lost its
normal colour. Churchills last recorded position was 400 nautical
miles east of New Jersey. Water depth in this area is approximately 4 500
metres, which means that there is little chance of finding the whale
without a telemetry signal.
Churchill was seen entangled in fishing gear for the first time on June
8 near Cape Cod, Massachusetts. He was identified as a 50 tonne adult
male. Researchers feared he would die if the rope that was tightly wrapped
around his upper jaw were not removed. On June 9, a telemetry buoy was
attached to one of the lines trailing from the whale. The transmitter on
the buoy allowed researchers to track his movements for nearly 5 000
nautical miles. Over the course of his voyage he travelled as far as an
area north of the Magdalene Islands in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. This is
the longest that any right whale has been tracked using satellite
telemetry. Five separate attempts were made to free the whale when
location and weather conditions permitted. The rescue team was able to
successfully administer medication and sedatives to the whale, however,
removing the rope, which required surgery, was not possible. The research
team was made up of experts affiliated with American governmental
agencies, private laboratories and research groups, universities and
aquaria. This event brought about the development of expertise that will
be useful to help other injured whales in the future. [Center for Coastal
Studies, Environment News Service]
I want to know more
On Whales online:
To the rescue of a right whale (28 June
2001)
Center for Coastal Studies press release: Scientists lose track of Churchill
On Environment News Service: Entangled right whale may be dead
Top of page
20 September 2001
Arctic Conservation Plan
The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is gearing up to protect the
fragile ecosystems of the Arctic. WWF representatives from eight countries
got together in Toronto last September 6 and 7 to discuss a conservation
plan for the Arctic. These countries included Canada, Denmark, Finland,
Iceland, Norway, Russia, Sweden and the United States. They agreed to take
several actions for 2010.
Among other things, they plan to create marine conservation areas to
protect marine species like walrus and various species of whales. Land
based and fresh water protected areas will also be created. Other animals
to be protected include large land mammals (polar bears, brown bears,
wolves reindeer, caribou, muskoxen and wolverines) and migratory birds.
Arctic ecosystems are under threat from mining and oil exploration,
from infrastructure construction (roads, ports and pipelines) and the
industrialization that could follow, from hazardous industrial chemicals,
from pollution, and from climatic changes and thinning of ice.[Environment
News Service]
I want to know more
On Environment News Service: WWF Maps Ambitious Arctic Conservation Plan
Top of page
6 September 2001
Keiko: not yet ready for freedom
After three years of rehabilitation in Iceland, Keiko, the killer whale
made famous in the film "Free Willy", is still not ready to live with his
peers in the wild. The killer whale spent the summer socializing with
groups of wild killer whales. However, as they are now beginning their
migration, Keiko will be return to a protected bay for the winter.
According to the person in charge of Keiko's rehabilitation, Keiko made
progress this year. He separated from the rehabilitation boat on his own
initiative on several occasions. He also succeeded in locating and
integrating with wild whales on his own. However, he always returned to
the boat and was not able to forage enough to sustain himself.
Keiko, whose name signifies "Lucky One" in Japanese, is now 23 years
old. He was captured in Icelandic waters more than 20 years ago at the age
of two. He lived in several marine parks in Iceland and in North America
before becoming a film celebrity. The rehabilitation programme has been
led by Ocean Futures Society, a non-profit organization, since 1996. This
is the first attempt of its kind and no one knows what the chance of
success for this costly operation might be. [Ocean Futures, Reuters]
I want to know more
The Ocean Futures site, for news concerning
Keiko.
Top of page
23 August 2001
What is behind the "Dolphin Safe" tuna label?
A judgement handed down by the court of appeal will force the United
States to maintain its ban on encircling dolphins to capture tuna labelled
and sold as "Dolphin Safe".
Since 1959, tuna fishermen in the Eastern Tropical Pacific have taken
advantage of the tuna-dolphin association: they encircle groups of
dolphins and capture tuna found below them. This technique caused a great
deal of concern in the 1970s due to the high dolphin mortality rate
associated with it.
In 1979 an international organization put a system in place to make
fishermen aware of the problem in order to develop methods to avoid
dolphin deaths associated with the tuna fishery. In 1990, the United
States introduced the "Dolphin Safe" label to indicate tuna that had been
caught without following and capturing dolphins. Thanks to these
initiatives, dolphin mortality associated to the tuna fishery has dropped
by 98% in the Eastern Tropical Pacific since 1990.
The United States also imposed embargoes on different tuna fishing
countries between 1988 and 1994 without regard for the General Agreement
on Trade and Tariffs (GATT). As well, the alternative techniques used by
the American fleet since 1992 to avoid encircling dolphins were shown to
have very negative impacts on various marine species including juvenile
tuna, sharks and marine turtles. As a result of international agreements,
the United States was bound to lift embargoes and change the definition of
"Dolphin Safe" if no dolphins were killed or seriously wounded while
fishing for tuna.
This new definition was to be applied automatically in 1999 unless the
American government could prove that encircling tuna had a negative impact
on the dolphin populations concerned. American Commerce Secretary William
Daley concluded, on the basis of available data, that chasing and netting
dolphins while fishing for tuna had no negative impact on them. Pursuant
to this declaration, an association of environmental organizations filed a
lawsuit against Mr. Daley. The court of appeal has just passed judgement
in favour of the environmental groups, forcing the United States to
maintain its definition of "Dolphin Safe" which has been in place since
1990. The Bush administration has yet to decide what position it will
adopt on this issue. [NMFS, Environment News Service]
I want to know more
NMFS under the dolphin-tuna heading
Top of page
16 August 2001
The WWF supports controlled whaling
Last week, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) voiced its disappointment with
the results of the most recent meeting of the International Whaling
Commission (IWC) which was held at the end of July in London. WWF deplores
the IWC's inability to put in place measures for the control of
international whaling activities.
According to this environmental group, the anti-whaling nations should
propose an acceptable compromise to pro-whaling nations. The first step is
to agree on the content of the Revised Management Procedure. This plan
would open the door to a limited whale hunt.
Furthermore, the wildlife trade monitoring network, TRAFFIC, a joint
programme of the WWF and IUCN (the World Conservation Union), has just
published a report underlining progress made by Norway concerning its
control trade scheme for whale products. This programme includes, among
other things, a genetic catalogue of all whales legally hunted by Norway,
a measure aimed at controlling whale meat found on the international
market. Last January, Norway announced its intention to resume
international trade in whale products. The genetic catalogue should be
completed before the resumption of trade with Japan. [WWF, TRAFFIC, High
North Alliance]
I want to know more
On Whales-online:
What
exactly is going on with the whale hunt?
Archives
Whales from far and wide
On WWF (United States):
World Wildlife Fund Disappointed With International Whaling Commission's Failure To Protect Whales
On TRAFFIC web site:
Statement
to the 53rd Annual Meeting of the
International Whaling Commission
On the High North Alliance web site:
Conservationists find Norway's whale trade scheme satisfactory
Top of page
2 August 2001
Whaling: fifty-third IWC Conference, still no accord
The International Whaling Commission held its fifty-third conference
from July 23 to 27 in London. Discussions are more and more difficult and
tension is building. First of all, the ban has not yet been lifted. The
ban was voted on in 1982 and put into place in 1985-1986 in order to allow
the IWC Scientific Committee to evaluate whale stocks for the purpose of
eventually setting quotas. Next, adoption of the Revised Management Scheme
was postponed. This plan which includes, among other things, an inspection
and observation system for ensuring that quotas are respected, is an
indispensable condition for the lifting of the commercial whaling ban.
Member countries were required to study recommendations which had been put
forward at a special meeting held in Monaco last February concerning the
Revised Management Scheme for commercial whaling.
The number of IWC member countries hoping for a lifting of the ban is
growing every year. Some countries are interested in commercial whaling,
stating that certain whale populations could support whaling. Other
countries that do not hunt whales believe that the legalization of limited
commercial whaling is the only way to efficiently control this
activity.
Some member countries made allegations that Japan had bought the votes
of poorer countries, such as certain Caribbean states, and that it would
continue this type of recruitment in order to attain the 75% of votes
necessary to obtain a lifting of the ban at the next meeting. The
Japanese delegation denied these allegations saying that it is normal for
countries that depend on marine resources to be in favour of commercial
whaling.
Other important points that were discussed included whale sanctuaries
and world-wide whale population estimates. It is important to note that
the IWC must soon modify its estimates of the Antarctic minke whale
population which is presently hunted by the Japanese Last years
estimate of 760 000 is presently under revision by the IWCs
Scientific Committee. Also, two motions proposing the creation of whale
sanctuaries, one in the southern Pacific proposed by Australia and New
Zealand and the other in the southern Atlantic proposed by Brazil, were
rejected.
Japan put forward an objection to an IWC resolution that strongly
encouraged it to cease hunting dolphins in its coastal waters. However,
the Japanese delegation did agree to furnish data concerning this hunt in
order to render its activities more transparent.
The 2002 annual meeting will be held in Shimonoseki Japan. [
Kyodo Japan, The Associated Press, Ananova, Asia Times]
I want to know more
On Kyodo Japan :
IWC meeting ends with no accord on commercial whaling
Int'l whaling commission votes to protect dolphins
On The Associated Press
Whaling Conference Closes Without Vote
On Ananova :
Whaling ban remains in place for now
Minke
whale numbers may be lower than thought
Whaling commission rejects Pacific sanctuary
On Asia times :
Japan plays
it tough in whale debate
On the American Society of International Law web site:
Resolution
adopted by the 53rd annual meeting of the IWC
Top of page
19 July 2001
The hunt for grey whales by the Makah: broader scope
The Makah, a tribe from north-western Washington, has had its grey
whale hunting permit conditions broadened following a new environmental
assessment by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
In 1997, this American tribe had obtained a quota to hunt five grey
whales annually for subsistence purposes. However, the terms of the quota
allowed them to hunt only migratory whales. In other words, the Makah were
not allowed to hunt whales that resided in Juan de Fuca Straight.
A recent study by the NMFS demonstrated that Makah whaling had no
impact on the grey whale population, does not destroy habitat, does not
threaten other species and consuming the meat does not pose a threat to
human health. It also states that there is no reason to make a distinction
between migrating grey whales and Juan de Fuca Straight residents, as they
associate and interbreed. For these reasons the Makah now have the right
to hunt resident and migratory grey whales year round.
The Makah claim the right to whaling for cultural and social reasons.
They had hunted grey whales for several centuries, but stopped 75 years
ago due to a decline in the grey whale population because of overhunting
by non-natives. In 1998 they began whaling again, and since the start of
the hunt only one whale has been killed. This event raises controversy
with environmentalists. The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society is looking
into the affair and may file a lawsuit against the American government.
[Environment News Service, NMFS]
I want to know more
On Environmental News Service:
Makah Get More Whaling Rights in 2nd
Environmental Assessment
28 June 2001
To the rescue of a right whale
A team including experts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) is presently preparing an expedition to go to the
rescue of a North Atlantic right whale caught in fishing gear off Cape
Cod, Massachusetts. The whale is dragging a heavy fishing line around its
mouth and head, a situation that could eventually lead to the
animals demise.
A satellite-tracking device has been attached to the whale in order to
keep track of its position. The rescue team will get to work as soon as
tracking and weather allow.
Accidental entanglement in fishing gear is a main cause of injury and
death for this species. In the present situation, the severity of the
entanglement is such that extraordinary measures will be required in order
to free the animal. The rescue plan includes the use of buoys, sedatives
and special knives to cut the cord.
Despite the fact that this rescue attempt represents a stressful
situation for the animal, and a certain amount of danger for the rescuers,
everything will be put into play to free the whale, as the consequences of
failure are dire indeed. The North Atlantic right whale is threatened with
extinction, there are only just over 300 individuals left.[Environment
News Service]
I want to know more
On Environmental News Service:
NOVEL RESCUE PLANNED FOR ENTANGLED RIGHT WHALE
14 June 2001
New environmental standards for cruise lines
In the interest of better protecting the marine environment, the
International Council of Cruise Lines (ICCL) has adopted new mandatory
environmental standards for cruise ships.
ICCL is a cruise industry trade association that represents the
interests of more than 70 cruise industry suppliers and of 16 passenger
cruise lines in the North American cruise market. Its mission is to
participate in regulatory processes and policy development and to promote
measures that foster a safe, secure and healthy cruise ship environment.
Each year ICCL member operators carry more than seven million passengers
on over 90 ships.
The new standards target the following areas:
- Improving cruise ship design and construction to make them as
environmentally friendly as possible
- Using new technology that is less harmful for the environment
- Complying fully with international and U.S. environmental laws
- Putting in place monitoring programmes
- Minimizing waste production and correctly disposing of waste
(wastewater, bilgewater, all forms of chemical products, used batteries,
used fluorescent and mercury vapour lamp bulbs, photocopy and laser
printer cartridges, recycling of glass, cardboard, aluminum, steel,
etc.)
I want to know more
ICCL press release:
New Mandatory Environmental Standards for Cruise Ships
10 May 2001
Opposition to U.S. Navy active sonar
The last of three public hearings organized by the NMFS, the American
agency responsible for marine resource management, concerning a permit
request by the U.S. Navy, was held on May 3, 2001. The U.S. Navy plans to
deploy its low frequency active sonar in 80 percent of the worldÃs oceans
over the course of a five-year programme. These active sonar were devised
to detect silent submarines. The project raised heavy opposition from the
general public, independent scientists and environmental groups, claiming
that low frequency active sonar harms marine mammals and was the cause of
massive whale strandings. The object of the public hearings is the
granting of a permit, which would allow the Navy to harass, injure or kill
marine mammals.
The public hearing took place in Silver Spring, Maryland. The public
has until May 18, 2001 to send comments to the NMFS concerning the
deployment of the U.S. Navy's low frequency active sonar system.
[Environment News Service, NRDC]
I want to know more
On Environment News Service :
U.S. Navy's Loud Ocean Sonar Draws
Intense Objections
26 April 2001
Whaling: Japanese return from the Antarctic with 440 minke whales
A Japanese fleet harvested 440 minke whales in the Antarctic between
November and April. This hunt raises controversy; the IWC (International
Whaling Commission) implemented an international moratorium on commercial
whaling in 1986. Japan, which is a member of the IWC, continues to hunt
whales despite the moratorium thanks to a clause in the IWC convention
which allows for scientific hunting.
The Japanese were whaling in international waters that are considered a
whale sanctuary. Japan maintains that its whaling programme allows it to
collect important data concerning whale populations and the ecological
roles they play. The whale meat is sold in Japanese markets to
cover a portion of the research cost, the rest of the cost is covered by
government subsidy.
Despite the opposition by numerous IWC member countries and
environmental groups, like Greenpeace and IFAW, a coalition led by Japan
and Norway is pushing to lift the ban on commercial whaling. The IWC is
studying a new inspection and observation scheme to control whaling.
Members will reach a decision concerning the resumption of the commercial
hunt at the next annual IWC conference which will be held in London in
July 2001. [Environment News Service]
I want to know more
On Environment News Service :
Condemnation greets return of
Japanese whalers
April 5 2001
Endangered species status for the California grey whale
population?
On March 29, two environmental groups, Australians for Animals and
The Fund for Animals, filed a petition in Washington asking that the
eastern North Pacific or "California" grey whale be listed as a
threatened or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
The grey whale was nearly exterminated in 1880. This population was put
under the protection of the of the ESA in 1970, only to be de-listed in
1994.
Offshore oil and gas development, bottom trawling, sediment
contamination, global warming and El-nino events have caused drastic
changes in Bering and Chukchi seas, two major feeding grounds for the
eastern North Pacific grey whales. Among these changes is a notable
decline in abundance of benthic amphipods, the primary food source of the
grey whale.
The number of strandings has risen from a total of 250 between 1990
and 1998, to 274 and 291 respectively for the years 1999 and 2000. Certain
scientists propose that this increase in mortality, as well as the decline
in births, from 1520 in 1997 to only 282 in 2000, are directly related to
an inadequate food supply for the grey whale population. Finally,
traditional hunting by both American and Russian aboriginals is also
considered a potential threat.
According to the petition, the eastern North Pacific grey whales fulfil
three of the five criteria for ESA listing: 1) their habitat has been
modified or destroyed, 2) natural and manmade threats affecting its
continued existence, 3) regulatory mechanisms in place are inadequate for
the protection of the population. The American government is obliged to
put in place measures for the protection of species present on the ESA
list. [Fund for animals, Journal of cetacean research and management]
I want to know more
On Whales online: Are grey whales
starving to death? (14 December 2000)
Fund for Animals press release: Gray
Whales Need
Protection: Groups Ask Government To Re-List Population Under the
Endangered Species Act
15 March 2001
Cetacean strandings in the Bahamas: one year later
One year ago, several cetaceans belonging to various species, mostly
beaked whales, stranded in large numbers on the beaches of northern
Bahamas islands. At the same time, in the same area, the American Navy was
testing new tactical sonar that emitted very powerful sounds. Since
then, NOAA Fisheries, a department of the American government overseeing
marine resources, carried out studies on six of the whale carcasses
recovered after the strandings. The American Navy is collaborating in this
study by analyzing acoustical, oceanographic and environmental data
associated with the event. Initial results of these studies show that the
whales had injuries that resulted from being exposed to very powerful
sound. Scientists from NOAA Fisheries and the American Navy
conclude, for the moment, that these injuries disoriented the
whales, and that they then died after having beached themselves. The
American Navy admits the tactical sonar that it was testing at the time
could be the cause of these injuries. However, Ken Balcomb, an independent
researcher who has been working for years with the beaked whales of the
Bahamas, believes that the relationship between the sonar and the dead
beaked whales is much more direct. Mr. Balcomb's analysis suggests that
the injuries observed in the beaked whales were caused by a resonance
phenomena in the whale's cranial air spaces. This phenomena is independent
of sound intensity and is related to characteristics of cranial sinuses
and emitted sound frequencies. Ken Balcomb also believes that this
phenomena killed most, if not all, of the beaked whales in the area and
that those that stranded were but temporary survivors. The American Navy
carries out testing of these tactical sonars world-wide. The final
report of the American Navy and NOAA Fisheries should be available by next
summer. [NOAA Fisheries, Ken Balcomb, The Sun of Bremerton, U.S. Navy,
Defence Environment Alert]
I want to know more
Letter from Ken Balcomb to those responsible for the study of the Bahamas strandings (23 February 2001)
American Navy press
release (15 November 2000)
NOOA Fisheries Article " Update on the mass stranding in the Bahamas ", published in the MMPA Bulletin
2nd/3rd Quarter 2000, available in pdf.
Top of page
1st March 2001
Baja California: funding for environmentally sustainable projects
On February 9, two environmental groups, the International Fund for
Animal Welfare (IFAW) and the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC),
announced the establishment of a one million pesos (US$ 100 000) fund to
assist the communities surrounding Laguna San Ignacio, Baja California.
These communities had backed the two groups in their opposition to a joint
project of the Mexican government and Mitsubishi Corporation. The proposed
project was to convert Laguna San Ignacio, one of the last nurseries for
the Eastern Pacific grey whale population, into an industrial salt
factory. Laguna San Ignacio was declared a World Heritage Site by UNESCO
in 1993. It is home to several species of endangered plant and animal
life. The Mexican government and Mitsubishi announced the cancellation of
the project on March 2, 2000, following the recommendations of an
environmental impact study led by a team from UNESCO.
The fund set up by IFAW and NRDC is to help the communities around
Laguna San Ignacio create environmentally sustainable projects, as well as
to improve health and education within the communities. The fund will also
be used to identify investment needs. As it stands, these communities are
still waiting for the Mexican government to live up to its promises of
financial support for alternative sustainable development in Laguna San
Ignacio. [Environment News Service]
I want to know more
On Environment News Service:
BAJA TOWNS STRUGGLE AFTER SAVING WHALE
SANCTUARY
Top of page
15 February 2001
Whaling: are we on the verge of a lifting of the ban?
A special meeting held from February 6 to 8 in Monaco by the
International Whaling Commission (IWC) was attended by representatives of
its 40 member nations. The goal of this meeting was to discuss the Revised
Management Scheme for commercial whaling. The scientific committee of the
IWC has completed a procedure for calculating whaling quotas, the Revised
Management Procedure. With limited data, this procedure will be used to
propose prudent whaling quotas for certain whale populations when they are
abundant, all the while taking into account the uncertainty of data, the
degradation of the environment, and the lack of understanding of
population dynamics. Member nations must now agree on the other aspects of
the management scheme, specifically: international supervision of whaling
activities, the control of hunting methods, genetic tracking of each whale
killed and funding of the management plan. The recommendations stemming
from this special meeting must be approved at the annual meeting of the
IWC to be held in London in July 2001 before a decision can be reached
concerning a lifting of the commercial whaling ban. However, member
nations are far from a common accord on all aspects of the Revised
Management Scheme. [International Whaling Commission, Environment News
Service]
I want to know more
What exactly is going on with the whale hunt?
On Environment News Service: IWC Considers Resuming Commercial Whale Hunt
On the IWC site: Intersessional Meeting of the Working Group on the Revised Management Scheme
Top of page
1 February 2001
North Atlantic right whales: increase in number of births
Researchers studying right whales on their breeding and calving grounds
along the coasts of Florida and Georgia have sighted at least 14 births
over the course of the last two months. This is more than have been
sighted in the last three years combined. There are an estimated 300 right
whales in the North Atlantic. Seventy of them are females capable of
giving birth. On average, researchers count 11 births per year. Last year
only one birth was sighted, while in 1996 researchers reported 21 births.
The low birth rate of the last three years appears to be linked to low
levels of zooplankton in Cape Cod Bay, which is an important feeding
ground for the North Atlantic right whale. This species is the most
endangered great whale in the world. The leading causes of deaths are
entanglement in fishing gear and collision with ships. [Florida Times,
Center for Coastal Studies]
I want to know more
Right whale fact sheet
Center for Coastal Studies Report linking zooplankton abundance in Cape Cod Bay to the number of right whale births
Northeast Fisheries Science Center - Press Release : Fourteen Right Whale Calves Sighted in Southern US Waters
Do you have an idea to solve the problem of right whale entanglement in fishing gear? Send it to the Eubalaena Award
Competition: your idea could save an endangered species...and you could win US$ 5 000!
Top of page
January 25 2001
Norway to permit export of whale blubber and meat
On January 16, Norway announced its decision to allow the export of
whale products for the first time since the 1980s. Exports will be mainly
to Japan, but will also be directed to Iceland and Peru. Norway reinstated
the commercial hunt of minke whales in 1993 after having officially
opposed the international moratorium decreed by the International Whaling
Commission (IWC ). Another convention, CITES (Convention on International
Trade in Endangered Species), prohibits the international trade in
endangered species. Neither Norway nor its three target markets are bound
by the ban with regards to whale products due to formal objections they
made that certain whale populations were listed in Annex 1 of the
Convention which prohibits international trade. Norway had, up until now,
barred the export of whale products for fear of a backlash of
international public opinion.
Commercial whaling undertaken by Norway since 1993 has supplied
domestic markets with whale meat. Six hundred tonnes of blubber, spurned
by Norwegians but highly prized by the Japanese, are in storage in
freezers pending permission to export. Norwegian whalers have been putting
pressure on their government to resume exports of whale products. The
Norwegian Seafood Export Council estimates that Norwegian companies have
lost 9.8 million Norwegian crowns ($CN 1.7 million) due to the ban since
the resumption of whaling in 1993.
Norwegian whalers are very pleased with their governments
decision. The export of whale products will only begin once the genetic
catalogue is completed. This will likely take several weeks. The catalogue
will include the "signatures" of all animals hunted by Norway in recent
years. The purpose of this measure is to ensure the origin of whale
products found on the open market.
Several environmental groups, such as Greenpeace, the World Wildlife
Fund and Sea Shepherd International, strongly oppose Norways
decision and are calling on countries like the United States, Australia
and England to impose economic sanctions. They fear that poaching and
raising of quotas will inevitably result. Norways whaling quota for
2001 is set at 549 minke whales. This is down from 2000 (655 minke whales)
and 1999 (753 minke whales). Norwegian whalers protested the drop in early
December. Quotas have not been filled in recent years. Whalers chalk this
up to bad weather and strict zoning imposed by the government.
[Environment News Service, Reuters, Associated Press]
I want to know more
What exactly is going on with
the whale hunt?
On Whales-online, 8 May 2000: CITES: no to international
whale trade
On Environment News Service Norway under fire for resuming whale trade
Top of page
18 January 2001
Hong Kongs pink dolphin threatened with extinction
The population of pink dolphins living in the Pearl River Delta is
severely threatened. As few as 180 of these dolphins remain in the waters
around Hong Kong, while the total Delta population is estimated at
approximately 1000 animals. The main threats for this population are
pollution, lack of food due to over-fishing, habitat loss and boat
collisions. The Pearl River drains a territory, occupied by one eighth of
the population of China, where numerous polluting industries are present
and where DDT is still in use. Due to problems of enforcement, a dolphin
sanctuary and strict environmental laws have not been sufficient to
protect this species.
These dolphins belong to the species Sousa chinensis, a coastal
species that is also found off South Africa, Australia and along the
Chinese Coast as far as the Yangtze River. The Chinese dolphins differ
from the others by the pink colour of the adults. Lindsay Porter of the
University of Hong Kongs Swire Institute of Marine Science has
observed that the majority of all calves born in the Pearl River Delta die
from pollution. She goes on to state that the population is in effect
losing a whole generation, which could translate into a major reduction in
numbers in ten years or so.
The pink dolphin was chosen as a mascot for Hong Kong, to celebrate the
return of the former British colony to China in 1997. This form of
visibility helped environmentalists raise awareness to the plight of the
dolphin in Hong Kong waters. According to Hong Kong Dolphinwatch, a group
that organizes cruises to go see the dolphins, many residents of Hong Kong
are still not aware that the dolphin even exists and that its survival is
endangered. [Reuters, Hong Kong Dolphinwatch]
I want to know more
Hong Kong
Dolphinwatch site
Indo-Pacific
hump-backed dolphin fact sheet
Top of page